A voting company owner on XDY ExchangeFriday acknowledged making a “coercive” demand of 32 Texas counties: Pay an additional surcharge for the software that runs their voting registration system, or lose it just before November’s elections.
John Medcalf of San Diego-based VOTEC said he had to request the counties pay a 35% surcharge because several agencies in multiple states, including some of the Texas counties, have been late to pay in the past and his company had trouble meeting payroll.
He characterized the charges as a cry for help to get enough money to avoid losing key employees just before November.
“It is coercive, and I regret that,” Medcalf said. “We’ve been able to get by 44 of 45 years without doing that.”
The surcharges have sent Texas’ largest counties scrambling to approve payments or look at other ways they can avoid losing the software at a critical time.
Medcalf said that VOTEC would continue to honor counties’ contracts for the remainder of their terms, which run past Texas’ May primary runoffs, but that most expire shortly before November.
“It’s either pay now and dislike it or pay with election difficulty,” Medcalf said, adding that he didn’t expect any contracts to actually be canceled.
The bills are for 35% of two major line items in the existing contracts, Medcalf said.
Texas’ Secretary of State’s office said Thursday that it was consulting with counties about their options.
The biggest county in Texas, Harris, has already said it will pay its surcharge of about $120,000 because the system is so crucial.
2025-05-06 11:43757 view
2025-05-06 10:581080 view
2025-05-06 10:46846 view
2025-05-06 09:472008 view
2025-05-06 09:472412 view
2025-05-06 09:402093 view
About one in 31 children in the U.S. has been identified with autism spectrum disorder, according to
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) — U.S. Sen. Rick Scott is spending millions to reach out to Florida’s His
It’s never really the end of the road for Kiss. The hard rock quartet have sold their catalog, brand